Insta-Print, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
  2. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  3. Vulcan Hart Corp.

    718 F.2d 269 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 44 times
    Holding “Rule 408 excludes evidence of settlement offers only if such evidence is offered to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim under negotiation”
  4. Huck Mfg. Co. v. NLRB

    693 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 29 times
    Finding of no impasse supported by fact that "Union's chief negotiator testified that he never felt the parties were at an impasse"
  5. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Hi-Tech Cable Corp.

    128 F.3d 271 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the temporal proximity between the unfair labor practices and the withdrawal of recognition allows for a conclusion that employees' display of disaffection for their union might have been induced by the company's unlawful actions
  7. Safeway Trails, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    641 F.2d 930 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding § 8 violation when employer told employees that union was to blame for state of negotiations
  8. Shopmen's L. Un. No. 733 v. N.L.R.B

    219 F.2d 874 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 12285. March 2, 1955. Fred W. Elarbee, Jr., Atlanta, Ga. (Poole, Pearce Hall, Edwin Pearce, Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for petitioner. Wilson Sims, Nashville, Tenn. (Cecil Sims, Bass, Berry Sims, Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for intervener. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, and Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. The local A