Insight Global, LLC

25 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 279 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 872 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 483 (1978) Cited 221 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Wright v. Council of City of Emporia
407 U.S. 451 (1972) Cited 187 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts should not approve a desegregation plan if the plan offers "`quality education' to some children, [but] has a substantial adverse effect upon the quality of education available to others"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.
516 U.S. 85 (1995) Cited 85 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"
D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013) Cited 142 times 145 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) Cited 66 times 103 Legal Analyses
Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
Flex Frac Logistics, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
746 F.3d 205 (5th Cir. 2014) Cited 31 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8

Insight Global, LLC

25 Cited authorities

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

Holding that courts should not approve a desegregation plan if the plan offers "`quality education' to some children, [but] has a substantial adverse effect upon the quality of education available to others"

Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"

Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

Holding that a workplace rule preventing employees from discussing wage information violates § 8