§

Inland Press

07-CA-050893 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 26, 2008)
Inland Press

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

    262 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy

  3. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  4. El Gran Combo de Puerto Rico v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    853 F.2d 996 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 10 times

    No. 87-1756. Heard March 8, 1988. Decided August 3, 1988. Carlos Bobonis Gonzalez with whom Bobonis, Bobonis Rodriguez Poventud, Santurce, P.R., was on brief for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., with whom Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before

  5. Interlake, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    529 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir. 1976)   Cited 2 times

    No. 75-1547. Submitted February 11, 1976. Decided February 17, 1976. Rody P. Biggert, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fair-weather Geraldson, Chicago, Ill., made argument for petitioner. He also filed appendix, brief and reply brief for petitioner. Andrew Tranovich, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent. Brief was filed for respondent in this Court. Counsel appearing on brief are: John C. Miller, Acting Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate