§

Ingram Micro Inc.

No. 78321253 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 15, 2011)
Ingram Micro Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Quabaug Rubber Co. v. Fabiano Shoe Co., Inc.

    567 F.2d 154 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 160 times
    Holding that an exclusive licensee had standing to sue under the Lanham Act, but a non-exclusive licensee did not

  2. Application of E.J. Brach Sons

    256 F.2d 325 (C.C.P.A. 1958)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6374. June 18, 1958. Cromwell, Greist Warden, Chicago, Ill. (Fred S. Lockwood, Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner of Patents. Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, and RICH, Associate Judges. JOHNSON, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, 112 U.S.P.Q. 267, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trademarks which refused registration of applicant's alleged

  3. Hygienic Products Co. v. Coe

    85 F.2d 264 (D.C. Cir. 1936)   Cited 13 times
    In Hygienic Products Co. v. Coe, 66 App. D.C. 98, 85 F.2d 264, 266, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held in a mandamus proceeding against the Commissioner of Patents that the plaintiff was entitled to register a trade-mark consisting of "a rectangular yellow panel, bounded by contrasting dark blue border, applied to the can or other package containing the goods.

  4. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,797 times   123 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark