Ing. C. Olivetti & C., S.p.A.

2 Cited authorities

  1. Giant Food, Inc. v. Nation's Foodservice

    710 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that the shared term GIANT is the dominant portion of the marks, which supports a finding that there would be a likelihood of confusion between them
  2. Playboy of Miami v. John B. Stetson Co.

    426 F.2d 394 (C.C.P.A. 1970)

    Patent Appeal No. 8240. May 28, 1970. John Cyril Malloy, Miami, Fla., attorney of record, for appellant. Samuels Clark, Thomas W.Y. Clark, J. Wesley Everett, Baltimore, Md., Munson Lane, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge, ALMOND, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and RAO, Chief Judge, United States Customs Court, sitting by designation. BALDWIN, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, sustaining an opposition by the appellee, John B.