§

Infinity Broad-casting Corp. of Dallas

No. 75689077 (T.T.A.B. Aug. 15, 2001)
Infinity Broad-casting Corp. of Dallas

14 Cited authorities

  1. Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Reebok International Ltd.

    998 F.2d 985 (Fed. Cir. 1993)   Cited 117 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court, in determining whether accused shoes infringed footwear manufacturer's trademarks and trade dress, had abused its discretion in failing to consider adequately the extent of post-sale confusion between the competing footwear

  2. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  3. Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Beamish & Crawford Ltd.

    937 F.2d 729 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 95 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issue of likelihood of confusion in a prior cancellation proceeding was sufficiently different from the issue of likelihood of confusion presented in subsequent litigation such that the Board's finding did not have preclusive effect

  4. In re Nat. Data Corp.

    753 F.2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "likelihood of confusion cannot be predicated on dissection of a mark"

  5. Electronic Design Sales v. Electronic Sys

    954 F.2d 713 (Fed. Cir. 1992)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that purchaser confusion is the "primary focus" and, in case of goods and services that are sold, "the inquiry generally will turn on whether actual or potential `purchasers' are confused"

  6. Weiss Associates, Inc. v. HRL Associates, Inc.

    902 F.2d 1546 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 21 times
    Affirming denial of registration of "TMM" mark for software because: it was likely to be confused with a registered mark "TMS," also used for software; "[t]he marks sound alike and look alike; and "[t]he products are very similar and directly compete."

  7. In re Martin's Famous Pastry Shoppe, Inc.

    748 F.2d 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1984)   Cited 18 times
    Finding likelihood of confusion between "Martin's" for bread and "Martin's" for cheese, since the products "travel in the same channels of trade," are sold by the "same retail outlets," and are "often used in combination"

  8. Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.

    851 F. Supp. 895 (N.D. Ill. 1994)   Cited 7 times

    No. 94 C 263. January 26, 1994. Thomas R. Vigil, Vigil Hanrath, Barrington, IL, Holland C. Capper, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff. Kenneth P. Taube, Rothschild, Barry Myers, Chicago, IL, Arnold P. Lutzker, Dow, Lohnes Albertson, Washington, DC, for defendants. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LEINENWEBER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pallmeyer to whom the matter was referred by this Court for hearing of Plaintiff's Application for Preliminary

  9. In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

    837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

  10. USA Network v. Gannett Co.

    584 F. Supp. 195 (D. Colo. 1984)   Cited 9 times

    Civ. A. No. 84-JM-522. March 30, 1984. Robert C. Dorr, Burton Dorr, Denver, Colo., Gerald Harris, Martin P. Michael, Rubin, Baum, Levin, Constant Friedman, New York City, for plaintiff. Josephine R. Weirich, Andrew M. Low, Davis, Graham Stubbs, Denver, Colo., for defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN P. MOORE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before me on the motion of plaintiff USA Network for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants Gannett Co., Inc., and Combined

  11. Section 303 - Powers and duties of Commission

    47 U.S.C. § 303   Cited 278 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting the Commission authority to prevent interference among radio and television broadcast stations