Industrial Stationery & Printing Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Columbian Co.

    306 U.S. 292 (1939)   Cited 994 times
    Defining substantial evidence
  2. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"
  3. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Chicago Apparatus Co.

    116 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1941)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Chicago Apparatus Co., 116 F.2d 753, 756, and National Labor Relations Board v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 83, cases cited and relied upon by the defendant, such a written designation had been obtained.
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. May Dept. Stores Co.

    146 F.2d 66 (8th Cir. 1945)   Cited 19 times

    No. 12840. December 20, 1944. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing January 11, 1945. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order requiring May Department Stores Company, doing business as Famous-Barr Company, to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively with a union as the exclusive representative of all the employees engaged in the busheling rooms. Order of the Board enforced. Eugene R. Thorrens

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Franks Bros. Co.

    137 F.2d 989 (1st Cir. 1943)   Cited 19 times

    No. 3872. July 27, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Franks Brothers Company for enforcement of the board's order directing respondent to bargain collectively with the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, CIO, as the exclusive representative of respondent's employees, and refrain from interfering with, restraining or coercing such employees. Decree enforcing the order. Malcolm A. Hoffmann

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kingston

    172 F.2d 771 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 7 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kingston, 6 Cir., 172 F.2d 771, the court emphasized that there was not present a background of anti-union conduct.
  8. Lebanon Steel Foundry v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    130 F.2d 404 (D.C. Cir. 1942)   Cited 12 times

    No. 7990. Decided June 29, 1942. Writ of Certiorari Denied October 12, 1942. See ___ U.S. ___, 63 S.Ct. 58, 87 L.Ed. ___. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Lebanon Steel Foundry against National Labor Relations Board to review and set aside an order of the board. Enforcement ordered. Mr. Hugh P. McFadden, of Bethlehem, Pa., for petitioner. Mr. Ernest A. Gross, Assistant General Counsel, with whom Mr. Robert B. Watts, General Counsel, Mr

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Everett Van Kleeck

    189 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 202, Docket 21903. Argued May 8, 1951. Decided May 31, 1951. George P. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Harvey B. Diamond and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Adolph Bangser, New York City, for respondent. Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The decision and order under review affirms the Trial Examiner's conclusion

  10. NATIONAL LABOR REL. v. VAN DE KAMP'S, BAKERS

    152 F.2d 818 (9th Cir. 1946)   Cited 7 times

    No. 10949. January 7, 1946. Decree Amended March 26, 1946. Rehearing Denied March 29, 1946. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against Van De Kamp's Holland-Dutch Bakers, Inc. Order enforced in accordance with opinion. David A. Morse, Gen. Counsel NLRB, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Joseph B. Robison and Eleanor Schwartzbach