Industrial Fabricating Inc.
24 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 timesUpholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board
324 U.S. 9 (1945) Cited 428 timesHolding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Walling v. Reuter Co.
321 U.S. 671 (1944) Cited 101 timesHolding that the dissolution of a corporate party does not render a case moot
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle
211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 54 timesSubcontracting union work
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.
128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942) Cited 62 timesNo. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten
105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939) Cited 62 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McCatron
216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. McCatron, 216 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. den., 1955, 348 U.S. 943, 75 S.Ct. 365, 99 L.Ed. 738, strikers acted in the good faith but mistaken belief that a fellow employee, whose reinstatement they sought, had been discharged because of union activities.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Madrid Mfg. Co.
215 F.2d 908 (8th Cir. 1954) Cited 25 timesIn New Madrid the business was transferred to a new employer, which was held liable for the unfair labor practices committed by its predecessor before closing.