§

Induction Services, Inc

292 N.L.R.B. 863 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Induction Services, Inc

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. Local 512, Warehouse & Office Workers' Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    795 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 36 times
    In Local 512 v. NLRB ("Felbro"), 795 F.2d 705, 722 (9th Cir. 1986), the Ninth Circuit reached this holding after observing that " Sure-Tan gave no indication that it was overruling a significant line of precedent that disregards a discriminatee's legal status, as opposed to availability to work, in determining his or her eligibility for back pay."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. DMR Corp.

    795 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1986)   Cited 11 times

    No. 85-4287. July 28, 1986. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 28, 1986. John F. Welsh, Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Laura M. Franze, Ronald M. Gaswirth, Dallas, Tex., for respondents. Louis V. Baldovin, Jr., Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. Application For Enforcement Of An Order Of The National Labor Relations Board. Before GOLDBERG, HILL and JONES, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Newtown Corp.

    819 F.2d 677 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 5 times

    No. 86-5911. Argued May 4, 1987. Decided June 3, 1987. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marc B. Seidman (argued), Linda Dreeben, Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert Houlihan (argued), Stoll, Keenon and Park, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and ENGEL and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us upon the application of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant