Indianapolis Motor Speedway Motel

8 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,306 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill

    308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times

    No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. ยง

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Kelly Picerne, Inc.

    298 F.2d 895 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 16 times

    No. 5869. February 14, 1962. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Herman I. Branse, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Robert J. McGarry, Providence, R.I., with whom Owen P. Reid and Graham, Reid, Ewing Stapleton, Providence, R.I., were on the brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY

  5. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    274 F.2d 738 (7th Cir. 1960)   Cited 17 times

    No. 12695. February 8, 1960. David B. Buerger, Pittsburgh, Pa., Buchanan, Ingersoll, Rodewald, Kyle Buerger, Pittsburgh, Pa. (William F. Jetter, Jr., Long Island City, N.Y., of counsel), for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Morton Namrow, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C., Attys, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is before

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. England Bros

    201 F.2d 395 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4694. February 2, 1953. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., Atty. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Hugh J. Corcoran, Springfield, Mass. (Ely, King, Kingsbury Lyman, Springfield, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the

  7. John S. Barnes Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    190 F.2d 127 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times
    In John S. Barnes Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 7 Cir., 190 F.2d 127, at page 130, where the company had no anti-union background or pattern of conduct hostile to unionism, this court said: "However, the courts have not considered isolated remarks or questions, which did not in themselves contain threats or promises, and where there was no pattern or background of union hostility, as coercion of the employees and as a violation of ยง 8(a)(1)."
  8. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    200 F.2d 148 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 14079. December 2, 1952. Roy C. Ledbetter, Dallas, Tex., James T. Fitzpatrick, Beaumont, Tex., for petitioner. Samuel M. Singer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RIVES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Feeling itself aggrieved by the findings and order of the Board, petitioner seeks to set the order aside while the Board, in