Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.

10 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills
339 U.S. 563 (1950) Cited 132 times
Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B
412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 30 times
Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Utility Wkrs
490 F.2d 1383 (6th Cir. 1974) Cited 11 times
Finding union to have violated NLRA by "insisting that final settlements of the collective-bargaining contracts covering separate units of employees of Ohio Power, Central Operating, and Wheeling Electric be withheld until final agreement was reached between the Respondents and the Employers in all the units in which the bargaining was taking place."
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers, International Union v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
486 F.2d 1266 (D.C. Cir. 1973) Cited 9 times
No. 72-1277. Argued January 16, 1973. Decided September 28, 1973. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., at the time the brief was filed, was on the brief, for respondent. David M. Heilbron, San Francisco, Cal., with whom William W. Schwarzer, San Francisco, Cal., and Bernard Marcus, New Orleans, La., were on the brief, for intervenors. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board
Solo Cup Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
332 F.2d 447 (4th Cir. 1964) Cited 14 times
No. 9141. Argued January 10, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964. Barry I. Robinson, Baltimore, Md. (Robert L. Sullivan, Jr., and Sklar Sullivan, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for petitioner. Stephen B. Goldberg, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Duane R. Batista, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNSWORTH, Circuit
Pepper Tanner, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
474 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1973) Cited 3 times
No. 72-1591. Argued February 1, 1973. Decided March 1, 1973. James E. Irwin, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Michael F. Messite, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Daniel M. Katz, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., John J.A. Reynolds, Jr., Director Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.
182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950) Cited 22 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.
Radiator Specialty Company v. N.L.R.B
336 F.2d 495 (4th Cir. 1964) Cited 7 times
No. 9124. Argued January 14, 1964. Decided August 3, 1964. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges. ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge: The National
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union
274 F.2d 376 (3d Cir. 1960) Cited 11 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, 274 F.2d 376, 379 (3d Cir. 1960), the court upheld the union's refusal to bargain where management had placed an ex-union official on its panel for the express purpose of "putting one over" on the union.
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.

10 Cited authorities

Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"

Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee

In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.

In National Labor Relations Board v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, 274 F.2d 376, 379 (3d Cir. 1960), the court upheld the union's refusal to bargain where management had placed an ex-union official on its panel for the express purpose of "putting one over" on the union.

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"