§

Indiana Cabinet Co., Inc.

275 N.L.R.B. 1209 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Indiana Cabinet Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  3. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.

    414 F.2d 1084 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times

    No. 19427. August 19, 1969. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan M. Marks, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Richard A. Brackhahn, of Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge, and VOGEL and HEANEY, Circuit Judges

  6. Precision Striping, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    642 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that " union security clause operates to compel new employees to join the union, because union membership is the price for obtaining a job," and that "it is well established that union membership is not always an accurate barometer of union support"

  7. Garrett R.R. Car Equipment, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    683 F.2d 731 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Explaining the rationale behind the Board's newly announced rule of not requiring an unlawfully discharged striker to unconditionally request reinstatement to trigger the employer's obligation to provide back-pay

  8. Texaco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    722 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1984)   Cited 7 times
    Recognizing that an employer's actions were unlawful when the employer, inter alia, "initiated and stimulated the activity that led to the employees' withdrawal from the Union," even though the employer had previously learned of employee dissatisfaction

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Daylin, Inc., Discount Division

    496 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times
    In Daylin, the retail store's no-solicitation rule prohibited all solicitation on its premises during "paid working hours.

  10. Section 102.46 - Exceptions and brief in support; answering briefs to exceptions; cross-exceptions and brief in support; answering briefs to cross-exceptions; reply briefs; failure to except; oral argument; filing requirements; amicus curiae briefs

    29 C.F.R. § 102.46   Cited 103 times
    Providing that the answering brief to exceptions "must be limited to the questions raised in the exceptions," "must present clearly the points of fact and law relied on in support of the position taken on each question," and "must specify those pages of the record which the party contends support the Judge's finding"