§

Independent Metal Workers Union, Local No. 1

147 N.L.R.B. 1573 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Independent Metal Workers Union, Local No. 1

10 Cited authorities

  1. Brown v. Board of Education

    347 U.S. 483 (1954)   Cited 2,665 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place"

  2. Bolling v. Sharpe

    347 U.S. 497 (1954)   Cited 1,889 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District of Columbia's maintenance of segregated schools violated the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause

  3. Shelley v. Kraemer

    334 U.S. 1 (1948)   Cited 1,698 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state court injunction to enforce a racially restrictive covenant against parties who did not wish to discriminate is state action

  4. Humphrey v. Moore

    375 U.S. 335 (1964)   Cited 760 times
    Holding that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation in negotiating a deal which favored some members of the same bargaining unit over others

  5. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  6. Tunstall v. Brotherhood

    323 U.S. 210 (1944)   Cited 286 times
    In Tunstall v. Brotherhood, 323 U.S. 210, the federal right was derived from the federal duty of the union to act as bargaining representative for all members of the union.

  7. Hurd v. Hodge

    334 U.S. 24 (1948)   Cited 256 times
    Holding that racially restrictive covenants were violative of section 1982 even though the legal rights of blacks to purchase or sell other property were unimpaired

  8. Railroad Trainmen v. Howard

    343 U.S. 768 (1952)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that an all-white union violated its duty of fair representation by pressuring the railroad to fire African-American employees in the represented craft and to hire white workers to replace them

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  10. Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel