§
In the Matter of Wong

19 Cited authorities

  1. Simmons v. United States

    390 U.S. 377 (1968)   Cited 6,511 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's testimony to establish standing for purposes of claiming a Fourth Amendment violation "should not be admissible against him at trial on the question of guilt or innocence"

  2. Nardone v. United States

    308 U.S. 338 (1939)   Cited 1,592 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search

  3. Cohen v. United States

    378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1967)   Cited 172 times
    Holding that evidentiary hearing is warranted only when defendant alleges facts "sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and nonconjectural, to enable the court to conclude that a substantial claim is presented"

  4. United States v. Gillette

    383 F.2d 843 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 146 times
    Holding that an attorney affidavit that does not allege personal knowledge on the part of a defendant's attorney does not raise a dispute as to a factual issue which requires a hearing

  5. State v. Elkins

    245 Or. 279 (Or. 1966)   Cited 103 times
    In State v. Elkins, supra, 245 Or at 288-92, the court noted three interests protected by section 9: privacy, property, and "some sort of a nebulous, poorly-defined right to be protected from undignified, forceable violations of the person," citing for the latter Rochin v. California, 342 U.S. 165, 72 S Ct 205, 96 L Ed 183 (1952).

  6. United States v. Halsey

    257 F. Supp. 1002 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)   Cited 100 times

    No. 66 Cr 334. September 2, 1966. Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of New York, for the United States, Roger J. Hawke, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel. Anthony F. Marra, New York City, for defendant, Edward S. Panzer, New York City, of counsel. OPINION FRANKEL, District Judge. Defendant is named in a two-count indictment charging narcotics violations. He has moved under Rule 41(e), Fed.R.Crim.P., to suppress evidence taken in the search of an apartment. Upon the testimony adduced

  7. United States v. Allison

    414 F.2d 407 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 49 times
    Requiring hearing outside of jury's presence

  8. Jackson v. United States

    351 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 40 times
    In Jackson v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 124, 351 F.2d 821 (1965), we declined to presume prejudice from a delay of five months, not 13 months as here, between an offense and an arrest.

  9. Hardin v. United States

    324 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 34 times
    In Hardin our Court held that a defendant seen on an elevator by jurors was not entitled to a reversal of his conviction where the defense refused an offer of cautionary instruction and decided not to interrogate jurors as to possible prejudice.

  10. Wilson v. United States

    218 F.2d 754 (10th Cir. 1955)   Cited 45 times

    No. 4958. January 3, 1955. James W. Wilson, Denver, Colo., for appellant. Robert D. Inman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boulder, Colo., for appellee. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. The appellant, John F. Wilson, and Newton H. Moore were indicted and convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado for acquiring and having transferred to them and having in their possession three marihuana cigarette butts and two thousand

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 1361 - Burden of proof upon alien

    8 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 342 times
    Providing that the burden of proof to show time, place, and manner of entry into the United States shifts to the alien once alienage is established