In the Matter of Wong

4 Cited authorities

  1. Chin Lau v. Kiley

    410 F. Supp. 221 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)   Cited 3 times

    No. 75 Civ. 1237-LFM. March 25, 1976. Edward J. Ennis, and Benjamin Gim, New York City, for plaintiff. Thomas J. Cahill, U.S. Atty. for S. D. N. Y., New York City by Thomas H. Belote, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for defendant. OPINION MacMAHON, District Judge. Defendant moves, and plaintiff cross-moves, for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., in this action for a declaratory judgment. The facts narrated below have been stipulated. The action is, therefore, ripe for summary

  2. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,773 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status
  3. Section 1153 - Allocation of immigrant visas

    8 U.S.C. § 1153   Cited 1,230 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Determining an applicant's age as " the age of the alien on the date on which an immigrant visa number becomes available for such alien . . . but only if the alien has sought to acquire the status of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence within one year of such availability; reduced by (B) the number of days in the period during which the applicable petition . . . was pending"
  4. Section 204.2 - Petitions for relatives, widows and widowers, and abused spouses and children

    8 C.F.R. § 204.2   Cited 445 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Conferring priority date retention on a derivative beneficiary only "if the subsequent petition is filed by the same petitioner"