§

In the Matter of Vizcarra-Delgadillo

13 I&N Dec. 51 (B.I.A. 1968)
In the Matter of Vizcarra-Delgadillo

7 Cited authorities

  1. Petite v. United States

    361 U.S. 529 (1960)   Cited 250 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting government's motion to remand to dismiss the indictment as contrary to the government's policy against multiple prosecutions based on the same conduct

  2. Marcello v. Bonds

    349 U.S. 302 (1955)   Cited 257 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it does not violate due process to have an adjudicator who is "subject to the supervision and control of officials in the Immigration Service charged with investigative and prosecuting functions"

  3. Vizcarra-Delgadillo v. United States

    395 F.2d 70 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 9 times
    In Vizcarra-Delgaldillo v. United States, 395 F.2d 70 (9th Cir. 1968) defense counsel erroneously believed the trial court had the discretion to spare the defendant from deportation.

  4. Pignatello v. Attorney Gen. of United States

    350 F.2d 719 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 4 times

    No. 479, Docket 28772. Argued May 17, 1965. Decided August 3, 1965. As Modified September 7, 1965. Edward S. Friedland, New York City, for petitioner. William N. McKee, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Joseph P. Hoey, U.S. Atty. Eastern Dist. of New York, on the brief), for respondent. Before WATERMAN, MARSHALL and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. Judge Marshall, of the panel that heard the case, authored the opinion of August 3 which is modified herein. After that opinion was filed and prior to consideration of

  5. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  6. Section 1546 - Fraud and misuse of visas, permits, and other documents

    18 U.S.C. § 1546   Cited 1,269 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Penalizing false statement in immigration documents

  7. Section 103.5 - Reopening or reconsideration

    8 C.F.R. § 103.5   Cited 214 times
    Authorizing officers to exercise their discretion to excuse untimely filing of motion to reopen or reconsider where movant demonstrates that delay was reasonable and beyond the movant's control