11 Cited authorities
Woodby v. Immigration Service
385 U.S. 276 (1966) Cited 747 timesHolding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
Immigration Service v. Errico
385 U.S. 214 (1966) Cited 108 times 1 Legal AnalysesRecognizing that doubts as to the correct construction of a deportation statute "should be resolved in favor of the alien"
Carbo v. United States
314 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1963) Cited 331 timesHolding that Rule 24(c) violations not brought to the district court's attention are forfeited
DE LUCIA v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERV
370 F.2d 305 (7th Cir. 1967) Cited 18 timesNo. 15661. November 17, 1966. Certiorari Denied February 13, 1967. See 87 S.Ct. 861. Jack Wasserman, Washington, D.C., Joseph I. Bulger, Chicago, Ill., David Carliner, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edward V. Hanrahan, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Paul De Lucia, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying discretionary
Ferrante v. Immigration Naturalization Serv
399 F.2d 98 (6th Cir. 1968) Cited 16 timesApplying § 1154(c) to uphold revocation of alien's "immediate relative" status obtained by current citizen-spouse under § 1151(b) where alien had entered into prior fraudulent marriage before current marriage to petitioning spouse
Waziri v. U.S. Immigration and Nat. Serv
392 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1968) Cited 15 timesIn Waziri v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, 392 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1968), this court held that where a petitioner has been ordered deported on the basis of an underlying order rescinding the petitioner's adjustment of status, "[t]he interdependency of the two orders requires that the [§ 1105a] power of review extend to the order rescinding" an adjustment of status.
De Souza v. Barber
263 F.2d 470 (9th Cir. 1959) Cited 16 timesIn De Souza v. Barber, 263 F.2d 470 (9th Cir. 1959), we did address whether there is a timeliness requirement that can bar a collateral attack in reinstatement proceedings based on a purported gross miscarriage of justice, and we held that there is.
Tovar v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv
368 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 2 timesIn Tovar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 368 F.2d 1006 (9 Cir. 1966), cert. den. 388 U.S. 915, 87 S.Ct. 2128, 18 L.Ed.2d 1356, a special inquiry officer determined Tovar was deportable, under Section 241(a) of the Act.
Rodriques v. Immigration Naturalization
389 F.2d 129 (3d Cir. 1968) Cited 1 timesNo. 16098. Argued October 30, 1967. Decided January 15, 1968. Lawrence Cooper, Schapira, Steiner Walder, Newark, N.J., for petitioner. Merna B. Marshall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and GANEY, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT GANEY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for review of an order of the Board of Appeals dismissing an appeal from an order of deportation entered after hearing by a Special Inquiry Officer of the Immigration and Naturalization
D'Andrea v. U.S. I.N.S.
335 F.2d 377 (6th Cir. 1964)No. 15744. August 17, 1964. Ned L. Mann, Cleveland, Ohio (John T. Feighan, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Eric J. Byrne, Atty., Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Joseph P. Kinneary, U.S. Atty., Charles G. Heyd, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cincinnati, Ohio, Kenneth C. Shelver, Atty., Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and CECIL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks review by this Court
Section 1105a - Employment authorization for battered spouses of certain nonimmigrants
8 U.S.C. § 1105a Cited 2,573 times 1 Legal AnalysesRequiring appellate courts to uphold the Board's conclusions if "supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record as a whole"