466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 162,640 times 179 Legal Analyses
Holding that ineffective assistance of counsel requires two showings: one, that "counsel's performance was deficient," and two, that "the deficient performance prejudiced the defense"
Relying on quoted legislative history in holding that certain retirement benefits were conditional and in the nature of early retirement benefits and so could not be considered accrued benefits
Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."
Holding that the substantial distinctions between a deportation proceeding and a criminal trial make Miranda warnings inappropriate in the deportation context
Holding that an attorney's decision to forego a defense and to concede removability was not ineffective assistance, and therefore the aliens were bound by his concession, because in exchange, he “was able to secure an extended period during which the [aliens] could liquidate their assets in an orderly fashion and still voluntarily leave the country”
Authorizing representation in immigration proceedings only by attorneys; law students and recent graduates not admitted to the bar working under appropriate supervision; reputable individuals who provide representation without compensation; representatives of accredited organizations; accredited officials; certain attorneys outside the United States; and amicus curiae