§

In the Matter of V---- Q

9 I&N Dec. 78 (B.I.A. 1960)
In the Matter of V---- Q

8 Cited authorities

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

    344 U.S. 590 (1953)   Cited 279 times
    Holding that an alien who permanently resided in the United States was "a person within the protection of the Fifth Amendment" and therefore was entitled to due process

  2. United States v. Vasilatos

    209 F.2d 195 (3d Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a ship crewmember "entered" the country under § 1326 when his request for admission was decided, not when he merely crossed the border into the United States

  3. United States v. Lazarescu

    104 F. Supp. 771 (D. Md. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 22353. May 6, 1952. Bernard J. Flynn, U.S. Atty., Thomas G. Gray, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., for plaintiff. Jack H. Hantman, New York City, for defendant. CHESNUT, District Judge. In this case the defendant was indicted by the Grand Jury for the District of Maryland on February 15, 1952 for violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 180(a). Section 180(a) provides (in material part) as follows: "(a) If any alien has been arrested and deported in pursuance of law, he shall be excluded from admission to

  4. United States v. Watkins

    170 F.2d 1009 (2d Cir. 1948)   Cited 4 times

    No. 67, Docket 21095. November 29, 1948. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States, on the relation of May Johnson, against W. Frank Watkins, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in the New York District, or such other person, if any, who may have the custody of May Johnson. From an order dismissing the writ and remanding the relator to the custody of the Commissioner of Immigration

  5. UNITED STATES v. TOD

    1 F.2d 246 (2d Cir. 1924)   Cited 16 times
    In United States ex rel. Fink v. Tod, 1 F.2d 246, 256 (2d Cir., 1924), reversed on confession of error, 267 U.S. 571, 45 S.Ct. 227, 69 L.Ed. 793 (1925), the court said: "When an alien arrives and applies for admission to the country, he may be detained and held without warrant until the immigration officials have determined whether he is entitled to admission.

  6. United States v. Day

    43 F.2d 917 (2d Cir. 1930)   Cited 7 times

    No. 387. July 28, 1930. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Application for writ of habeas corpus upon an order of deportation by the United States of America, on the relation of George Georgas, against Benjamin M. Day, Commissioner of Immigration at the Port of New York. From an order of the District Court dismissing the writ, relator appeals. Order affirmed. Harold Van Riper, of New York City, for appellant. Charles H. Tuttle, U.S. Atty., of

  7. Gee Shew Hong v. Nagle

    18 F.2d 248 (9th Cir. 1927)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5035. March 28, 1927. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; George M. Bourquin, Judge. Petition for habeas corpus by Gee Shew Hong against John D. Nagle, as Commissioner of Immigration for the Port of San Francisco. From an order denying the writ, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. Stephen M. White, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Geo. J. Hatfield, U.S. Atty., and T.J. Sheridan, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of San Francisco

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"