§

In the Matter of Taerghodsi

16 I&N Dec. 260 (B.I.A. 1977)
In the Matter of Taerghodsi

13 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Janis

    428 U.S. 433 (1976)   Cited 1,140 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding the exclusionary rule inapplicable to civil tax proceedings

  2. Shaughnessy v. Mezei

    345 U.S. 206 (1953)   Cited 634 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an excluded alien's indefinite detention on Ellis Island did not violate constitutional law because “he is treated as if he stopped at the border”

  3. Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding

    344 U.S. 590 (1953)   Cited 282 times
    Holding that an alien who permanently resided in the United States was "a person within the protection of the Fifth Amendment" and therefore was entitled to due process

  4. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 346 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  5. Tillman v. United States

    406 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 200 times
    Upholding trial judge's exercise of discretion in not declaring mistrial, after questioning jurors, when it was reported that a juror had said defendants should be "hung"

  6. Williams v. United States

    416 F.2d 1064 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 49 times
    Kidnapping in furtherance of attempt to avoid apprehension for first kidnapping was part of a series of interrelated crimes

  7. Chavez-Raya v. Immig. Naturalization Serv

    519 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times
    In Chavez-Raya v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 519 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1975) the court concluded that a custodial interrogation that did not involve a Miranda warning did not preclude admission of the alien's statement in a deportation proceeding.

  8. City of San Antonio v. C.A.B

    374 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 26 times

    Nos. 20383, 20464, 20500. Argued January 5, 1967. Decided February 7, 1967. Petition for Rehearing before the Division in No. 20,383 and Petition for Rehearing En Banc in No. 20,500 Denied April 3, 1967. Mr. Albert F. Beitel, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. William A. Wildhack, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 20,383. Mr. Robert M. Beckman, Washington, D.C., for petitioners in No. 20,464. Mr. Howard S. Boros, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in No. 20,500. Mr. George

  9. Avila-Gallegos v. I. N. S

    525 F.2d 666 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that, “[r]egardless of the legality of [the petitioner's] arrest,” his “deportation hearing testimony” about the “illegal manner of his entry” was admissible and, indeed, proved his deportability

  10. Cella v. United States

    208 F.2d 783 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 35 times

    No. 10744. December 2, 1953. Rehearing Denied December 30, 1953. John J. Toohey, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Neil Brooks, Associate Sol., Donald A. Campbell, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., Frank A. Gallagher, Regional Atty., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Chicago, Ill., J. Stephen Doyle, Jr., Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. Petitioner seeks a review of an order of the Judicial Officer of the U.S

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  12. Section 214.2 - Special requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status

    8 C.F.R. § 214.2   Cited 462 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Restating cap in 8 U.S.C. § 1184(g)(l)