§
In the Matter of T

10 Cited authorities

  1. Wood v. Hoy

    266 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    In Wood, we rejected the BIA’s interpretation as "not what the statute says" because the BIA "applied the statute as if it read ‘single criminal act’ " rather than "single scheme of criminal misconduct."

  2. Vlisidis v. Holland

    245 F.2d 812 (3d Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times
    In Vlisidis v. Holland, 3 Cir., 245 F.2d 812, at page 814, Circuit Judge Hastie said: "Actually, it was necessary to show only the single fact that the respondent was an alien, for, once that is proved, the legislative scheme requires the alien to justify his presence within the United States. 66 Stat. 234, 8 U.S.C. § 1361."

  3. Jeronimo v. Murff

    157 F. Supp. 808 (S.D.N.Y. 1957)   Cited 9 times
    In Jeronimo v Murff (157 F. Supp. 808), the defendant was convicted of several larceny crimes and one count of conspiracy in a single trial.

  4. Zito v. Moutal

    174 F. Supp. 531 (N.D. Ill. 1959)   Cited 7 times
    In Zito v Moutal (174 F. Supp. 531), the defendant was convicted at a single trial of two counts of illegal possession of untaxed liquor.

  5. United States v. O'Rourke

    211 F.2d 609 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14978. April 21, 1954. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1954. James Daleo, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo. (Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., and William O. Russell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Joplin, Mo., on the brief), for appellee. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. Nicolo Impastato, an alien in custody under a warrant of deportation issued July 22, 1953, petitioned the District Court for

  6. Vlisidis v. Holland

    150 F. Supp. 678 (E.D. Pa. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. Nos. 21438, 21463. April 18, 1957. Judgment Affirmed July 3, 1957. J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Louis C. Bechtle, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Gilbert Zimmerman, Regional Counsel, Southeast Region Immigration Naturalization Service, Richmond, Va., of counsel, for defendant. LORD, District Judge. These are like civil actions for declaratory judgments and judicial review. The plaintiffs have been found to be aliens subject to deportation

  7. Kielema v. Crossman

    103 F.2d 292 (5th Cir. 1939)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8963. April 21, 1939. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; T. Whitfield Davidson, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by Mees Kielema against L.D. Crossman, Immigration Inspector in Charge at Houston, Texas. From an order discharging the writ and remanding Mees Kielema to custody of the immigration inspector for deportation, Mees Kielema appeals. Affirmed. Arthur J. Mandell, of Houston, Tex., for appellant. Douglas W. McGregor, U.S. Atty., and Brian

  8. Section 1252 - Judicial review of orders of removal

    8 U.S.C. § 1252   Cited 43,410 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding court had no jurisdiction to review "any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b"

  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  10. Section 1361 - Burden of proof upon alien

    8 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 342 times
    Providing that the burden of proof to show time, place, and manner of entry into the United States shifts to the alien once alienage is established