§

In the Matter of S.S. "SARCOXIE"

1 I&N Dec. 250 (B.I.A. 1942)
In the Matter of S.S. "SARCOXIE"

4 Cited authorities

  1. Osaka Shosen Line v. U.S.

    300 U.S. 98 (1937)   Cited 51 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 224. Argued January 4, 1937. Decided February 1, 1937. 1. In penal statutes, no less than in others, the language, if clear, is conclusive. P. 101. 2. General expressions in an opinion which go beyond the case in which they were used, may be respected, but ought not to control the judgment in a subsequent suit presenting the very point for decision. P. 103. 3. Section 10(a) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, makes it the

  2. Hackfeld Co. v. United States

    197 U.S. 442 (1905)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that factual stipulations by parties are binding on the court

  3. Taylor v. United States

    207 U.S. 120 (1907)   Cited 45 times
    In Taylor v. United States, 207 U.S. 120, 28 S. Ct. 53, 54, 52 L. Ed. 130, a sailor had deserted his ship while on shore leave.

  4. United States v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line

    84 F.2d 482 (5th Cir. 1936)   Cited 3 times

    No. 7978. June 10, 1936. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Texas; Thomas M. Kennerly, Judge. Libel by the United States of America against the Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line, claimant of the steamship Santos Maru, and others. From a decree dismissing the libel, libelant appeals. Reversed and remanded, with directions. Douglas W. McGregor, U.S. Atty., and Brian S. Odem, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Houston, Tex. Robert Eikel, Jr., of Houston, Tex., for appellees