§

In the Matter of S.S. "COMOL CUBA"

1 I&N Dec. 426 (B.I.A. 1943)
In the Matter of S.S. "COMOL CUBA"

2 Cited authorities

  1. Compagnie Generale v. Elting

    298 U.S. 217 (1936)   Cited 16 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued October 14, 1935. Decided May 18, 1936. 1. Section 20(a) of the Immigration Act of 1924 imposes a fine upon "the owner, charterer, agent, consignee or master" of any vessel arriving in the United States from any place outside, who fails to detain any alien seaman employed on such vessel, after inspection by the immigration officer in charge at the port of arrival, if required by such officer to do so. Held, that the

  2. Lancashire Shipping Co. v. Durning

    98 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 6 times
    In Lancashire Shipping Co. v. Durning, 98 F.2d 751, 753 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 305 U.S. 635, 59 S.Ct. 102, 83 L.Ed. 408 (1938), the court held that the time requirement of the statute was satisfied when the administrative proceeding — though not the judicial action — was brought within the prescribed limitations period: "[I]f the administrative action resulting in the imposition of a fine was such a suit or proceeding as the statute covers, it was commenced within the five year period and the statute does not apply."