§

In the Matter of Sparrow

20 I&N Dec. 920 (B.I.A. 1994)
In the Matter of Sparrow

21 Cited authorities

  1. Kungys v. United States

    485 U.S. 759 (1988)   Cited 696 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government must meet its burden with "clear, unequivocal, and convincing" evidence

  2. Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co.

    481 U.S. 1041 (1987)   Cited 241 times
    Finding that an ice cream product's foil wrapper was functional, but that its overall appearance was not, and that competitor was precluded from using a foil wrapper with an overall appearance that was confusingly similar to the wrapper

  3. U.S. v. Summerlin

    310 U.S. 414 (1940)   Cited 597 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the United States is not bound by state statutes of limitation when enforcing delinquent tax liabilities

  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. U.S.

    304 U.S. 126 (1938)   Cited 447 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign-government sovereigns do not get the benefit of nullum tempus immunity, on the theory that "[b]y voluntarily appearing in the role of suitor, [the foreign sovereign] abandons its immunity from suit and subjects itself to the procedure and rules of decision governing the forum which it has sought" including statutes of limitation

  5. Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.

    812 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir. 1987)   Cited 286 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court could enjoin trademark infringement defendant from using any image of a polar bear on a five ounce chocolate-covered ice cream bar, despite the fact that plaintiff "has no exclusive right to use a polar bear image"

  6. Utah Power Light Co. v. United States

    243 U.S. 389 (1917)   Cited 460 times
    Holding that private rights in public lands of the United States within a state cannot be acquired under the state's power of eminent domain, unless Congress confers that right

  7. United States v. RePass

    688 F.2d 154 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 63 times
    Finding laches is not available against the United States

  8. Matter of Abrams

    521 F.2d 1094 (3d Cir. 1975)   Cited 62 times
    Reversing sanctions order for failing to follow local rule specifying disciplinary procedures

  9. United States v. Brantley

    786 F.2d 1322 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 35 times

    No. 84-2131. Argued June 12, 1985. Decided March 18, 1986. William T. Huyck, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellant. James R. Ferguson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Anton R. Valukus, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Before BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, Senior District Judge. The Honorable Robert A. Grant, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Indiana, is sitting by designation. GRANT

  10. Bostwick Irr. Dist. v. U.S.

    900 F.2d 1285 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 28 times
    Recognizing the "longstanding rule that laches does not apply to actions brought by the United States"

  11. Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

    18 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 21,554 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

  12. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,371 times   305 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements

  13. Section 641 - Public money, property or records

    18 U.S.C. § 641   Cited 2,945 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Requiring knowledge

  14. Section 1621 - Perjury generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1621   Cited 1,542 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing perjury

  15. Section 1351 - Nonimmigrant visa fees

    8 U.S.C. § 1351   Cited 2 times

    The fees for the furnishing and verification of applications for visas by nonimmigrants of each foreign country and for the issuance of visas to nonimmigrants of each foreign country shall be prescribed by the Secretary of State, if practicable, in amounts corresponding to the total of all visa, entry, residence, or other similar fees, taxes, or charges assessed or levied against nationals of the United States by the foreign countries of which such nonimmigrants are nationals or stateless residents:

  16. Section 1.1 - Applicability

    8 C.F.R. § 1.1   Cited 158 times
    Providing that LPR status terminates upon the entry of a final order of removal

  17. Section 292.1 - Representation of others

    8 C.F.R. § 292.1   Cited 43 times
    Authorizing representation in immigration proceedings only by attorneys; law students and recent graduates not admitted to the bar working under appropriate supervision; reputable individuals who provide representation without compensation; representatives of accredited organizations; accredited officials; certain attorneys outside the United States; and amicus curiae

  18. Section 292.3 - Professional conduct for practitioners-Rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 292.3   Cited 15 times
    Providing for sanctions against "a practitioner who is authorized to practice before DHS"