§

In the Matter of Sosa-Hernandez

20 I&N Dec. 758 (B.I.A. 1993)
In the Matter of Sosa-Hernandez

10 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 748 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"

  2. Fedorenko v. United States

    449 U.S. 490 (1981)   Cited 455 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Government carries a heavy burden of proof in a proceeding to divest a naturalized citizen of his citizenship" because "loss [of citizenship] can have severe and unsettling consequences"

  3. Francis v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    532 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 249 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "fundamental fairness" dictates that § 212(c) apply to resident aliens in deportation as well as exclusion proceedings

  4. Reid v. INS

    420 U.S. 619 (1975)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alien who falsely represented himself to be a citizen is deportable as one who has entered without inspection because he "significantly frustrated the process for inspecting incoming aliens"

  5. Matter of Longstaff

    716 F.2d 1439 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that the petitioner was not lawfully admitted because he was an “alien afflicted with psychopathic personality,” which made him inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182

  6. Cacho v. Immigration and Nat. Service

    547 F.2d 1057 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 75-2319, 75-2535. November 18, 1976. Robert S. Bixby (argued), of Fallon, Hargreaves, Bixby McVey, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 75-2319. Donald L. Ungar (argued), of Phelan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner in No. 75-2535. Richard I. Chaifetz, Atty. (argued), of Government Regulations Section, Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. Before MERRILL and

  7. Yik Shuen Eng v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    464 F.2d 1265 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 869, Docket 72-1054. Argued July 14, 1972. Decided July 27, 1972. Benjamin Gim, New York City, for petitioner-appellant. Stanley H. Wallenstein, Special Asst. U.S. Atty. (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U.S. Atty., S. D. N.Y., Joseph P. Marro, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Before FEINBERG, MULLIGAN and OAKES, Circuit Judges. MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,759 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  10. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility