§

In the Matter of Solomon

16 I&N Dec. 388 (B.I.A. 1977)
In the Matter of Solomon

10 Cited authorities

  1. Spevack v. Klein

    385 U.S. 511 (1967)   Cited 628 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the privilege protects a lawyer who refuses to give testimony that might incriminate himself

  2. Feldmann v. Perlman

    349 U.S. 952 (1955)   Cited 89 times

    C.A.2d Circuit. No. 743. June 6, 1955. Arthur H. Dean and Howard T. Milman for petitioners. Eugene Eisenmann and William E. Haudek for respondents. Reported below: 219 F.2d 173. Certiorari denied.

  3. In re Echeles

    430 F.2d 347 (7th Cir. 1970)   Cited 52 times
    Holding that United States had no standing to appeal the result of a disbarrment proceeding where nothing in record indicated that it had an interest in the matter or was a party to the underlying suit

  4. United States v. Abrams

    427 F.2d 86 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 37 times
    In United States v. Abrams, 427 F.2d 86, 91 (CA 2), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 832, 91 S.Ct. 64, 27 L.Ed.2d 63 (1970), the defendant had acted with reckless disregard of whether the statements made were true "and" with a conscious purpose to avoid learning the truth.

  5. Bogart v. Carter

    445 F.2d 321 (9th Cir. 1971)

    No. 25140. August 3, 1971. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Charles H. Carr, Judge. Phill Silver, Hollywood, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Chief, Crim. Div., Carolyn M. Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge. The summary judgment rendered against plaintiff-appellant is reversed. We think this is

  6. Couto v. Shaughnessy

    218 F.2d 758 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 14 times

    No. 146, Docket 23319. Argued December 16, 1954. Decided January 20, 1955. Nemeroff, Jelline, Danzig Paley, New York City, Aaron L. Danzig, New York City, of counsel, for appellant. J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City, Harold R. Tyler, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., and Lester Friedman, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, New York City, of counsel, for appellee. Before SWAN, FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Circuit Judge. The appellant is an alien seaman, a native of Portugal

  7. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 23,971 times   57 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  8. Section 1151 - Worldwide level of immigration

    8 U.S.C. § 1151   Cited 841 times
    Listing "immediate relatives" among the categories of immigrants not subject to numerical limitations on the number of visas issued annually

  9. Section 1430 - Married persons and employees of certain nonprofit organizations

    8 U.S.C. § 1430   Cited 121 times
    Authorizing the naturalization of "[a]ny person who is the surviving spouse, child, or parent of a United States citizen, whose citizen spouse, parent, or child dies during a period of honorable service in an active duty status in the Armed Forces of the United States"

  10. Section 292.3 - Professional conduct for practitioners-Rules and procedures

    8 C.F.R. § 292.3   Cited 15 times
    Providing for sanctions against "a practitioner who is authorized to practice before DHS"