5 Cited authorities
Woodby v. Immigration Service
385 U.S. 276 (1966) Cited 748 timesHolding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
Nishikawa v. Dulles
356 U.S. 129 (1958) Cited 89 timesHolding that, in the face of congressional silence on the question, proof of an act of expatriation must be by clear and convincing evidence
Girsh Trust
410 Pa. 455 (Pa. 1963) Cited 36 timesSeptember 28, 1962. March 21, 1963. Appeals — Review — Chancellor's fact findings — Undisputed facts — Inferences and conclusions — Prescribed standard of proof — Mental competency. 1. Where an auditing judge or chancellor who sees and hears the witnesses finds facts which have competent and adequate evidence to support them and these findings are approved by the court en banc, they will not be reversed on appeal. [466] 2. If the facts are undisputed, the reviewing court can draw the appropriate
Gonzalez-Jasso v. Rogers
264 F.2d 584 (D.C. Cir. 1959) Cited 2 timesNo. 14626. Argued January 14, 1959. Decided March 5, 1959. Mr. Joseph Forer, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. David Rein, Washington, D.C., was not the brief, for appellant. Mr. Harry T. Alexander, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Before WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges. WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge. The issue in the present case is whether uncorroborated extra-judicial admissions
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,155 times 1 Legal AnalysesDelineating crimes that make alien deportable