§
IN THE MATTER OF SANO

7 Cited authorities

  1. Joseph v. Landon

    679 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1982)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that an alien “d[oes] not have a vested right upon approval of visa petition”

  2. Wright v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    379 F.2d 275 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times
    Holding non-citizen spouse has no protected interest in an I-130 petition

  3. Sin v. Esperdy

    239 F. Supp. 903 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)   Cited 9 times
    In Hom Sin v. Esperdy, supra, 239 F. Supp. at 906, the court quoted with approval the Immigration and Naturalization Service's petition which admitted congressional concern for an employer in a Section 1154(b) determination.

  4. Scalzo v. Hurney

    225 F. Supp. 560 (E.D. Pa. 1963)   Cited 9 times

    Civ. A. No. 28047. December 18, 1963. Rudolph J. DiMassa, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., and Joseph R. Ritchie, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant. BODY, District Judge. This case tomes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Candida Scalzo, alleges that we have jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, and asks this Court to declare that an order of deportation entered against

  5. Pacheco Pereira v. I.N.S.

    342 F.2d 422 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 6 times

    No. 6429. Heard March 2, 1965. Decided March 18, 1965. William F. Long, Jr., Fall River, Mass., for appellant. John M. Callahan, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom W. Arthur Garrity, Jr., U.S. Atty., was on brief, for appellee. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, WATERMAN, Circuit Judge, and GIGNOUX, District Judge. Sitting by designation. PER CURIAM. This is a petition to review a decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, hereinafter Service, affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals, in which

  6. Section 204.1 - General information about immediate relative and family-sponsored petitions

    8 C.F.R. § 204.1   Cited 256 times
    Delimiting jurisdiction over immediate relative and family-sponsored visa petitions

  7. Section 205.2 - Revocation on notice

    8 C.F.R. § 205.2   Cited 62 times
    Requiring notice of intent to revoke, the opportunity for the petitioner to offer evidence supporting the petition, an explanation of “the specific reasons for the revocation,” and the opportunity for the petitioner to file an administrative appeal