Misc. Civ. No. 56-4. February 15, 1956. Edward O. Gourdin, Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Andrew A. Caffrey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., for respondent. WYZANSKI, District Judge. (dictated from the bench) This case comes before me upon an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. I shall deliver an oral opinion extemporaneously from the bench. The ultimate issue is whether the petitioner is subject to deportation in view of the fact that she admits, and the record before the immigration authorities
Civ. 53-187. December 1, 1949. Rosenblatt Spielberg, New York City, for petitioner. Irving H. Saypol, United States Attorney, New York City (William J. Sexton, Assistant United States Attorney, Lester Friedman, Attorney, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Miller. IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge. The relator herein seeks an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus. The relator, Hirsch Teper, a native and citizen of Great Britain
8 U.S.C. § 221 to 227 June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title IV, §403(a)(20), (22), (23), (29), 66 Stat. 279, eff. Dec. 24, 1952 Section 221, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §23, 43 Stat. 165, related to burden of proof upon entry of alien or in deportation proceedings. Section 222, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §24, 43 Stat. 166, related to rules and regulations. Section 223, act May 26, 1924, ch. 190, §25, 43 Stat. 166, related to quota law as additional to other immigration laws. Section 224, acts May 26, 1924
Petition for immediate relative or preference status. The consular officer may not issue a visa to an alien as an immediate relative entitled to status under 201(b), a family-sponsored immigrant entitled to preference status under 203(a)(1)-(4), or an employment-based preference immigrant entitled to status under INA 203(b)(1)-(5), unless the officer has received a petition filed and approved in accordance with INA 204 or official notification of such filing and approval. 22 C.F.R. §42.42 56 FR 49682