Civ. No. 4215. July 1, 1922. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Mendocino County denying an application for letters of administration. H. L. Preston, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. D. L. Held for Appellant. Will Van Dyke and Hale McCowen, Jr., for Respondent. KNIGHT, J., pro tem. — On July 22, 1921, the superior court of Mendocino County made its order appointing the respondent, Minnie Perry, as administratrix of the estate of Frank Perry, deceased

S.F. No. 3201. September 18, 1903. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying an application to set aside a homestead. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. M.C. Hassett, and Samuel Shortridge, for Appellant. The mere absence of the husband was not sufficient to raise the presumption of death. (Garwood v. Hastings, 38 Cal. 217; Estate of Richards, 133 Cal. 524; Kenzie v. Kenzie, 7 Daly, 460; Bailey v. Bailey, 36 Mich

Sac. No. 848. August 3, 1901. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County setting apart the estate of a deceased person to his widow. J.S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. J.H. Magoffey, for Appellant. L.F. Coburn, and J.W. Parker, for Respondent. COOPER, C. Appeal from order setting aside the whole of the estate to the widow of deceased. There is no question as to the value of the estate being less than fifteen hundred dollars, and that it was the duty of the