§
In the Matter of S

11 Cited authorities

  1. Bishop v. United States

    107 F.2d 297 (D.C. Cir. 1939)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting defendant's argument that intoxication defense could be used to establish the mitigating circumstance of adequate provocation because the “heat of passion” standard assumes an “ordinary man,” meaning “a sober man”

  2. Vidal Y Planas v. Landon

    104 F. Supp. 384 (S.D. Cal. 1952)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13459. April 3, 1952. Newman Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Walter S. Binns, U.S. Atty., Clyde C. Downing, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civil Division and Paul Magasin, Asst. U.S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant. WESTOVER, District Judge. Plaintiff herein is a native and national of Spain, having been born in that country on January 29, 1891. He came to the United States of America on November 26, 1938, being admitted at Tampa, Florida, as a visitor for four months. Plaintiff's

  3. Mercer v. Lence

    96 F.2d 122 (10th Cir. 1938)   Cited 15 times

    No. 1606. April 12, 1938. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah; Tillman D. Johnson, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by John Lawrence Mercer against M.F. Lence, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Labor, and the United States of America, to procure petitioner's release from custody for deportation to Canada. From an order discharging the writ and remanding petitioner to custody, petitioner appeals. Affirmed. Marshall Chapman

  4. United States v. Karnuth

    30 F.2d 825 (W.D.N.Y. 1929)   Cited 14 times
    In United States ex rel. Mongiovi v. Karnuth, D.C., 30 F.2d 825, the alien pleaded guilty to an indictment for manslaughter, second degree.

  5. Pillisz v. Smith

    46 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1931)   Cited 8 times

    No. 4461. February 7, 1931. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois; George A. Carpenter, Judge. Petition for writ of habeas corpus by Rose Pillisz, wife of and in behalf of Joseph Pillisz, against S.D. Smith, District Director of Immigration Service of the United States Department of Labor. Order dismissing the writ and remanding alien for deportation, and petitioner appeals. Affirmed. Maurice T. Weinshenk, of Chicago, Ill

  6. United States v. Doak

    5 F. Supp. 561 (N.D.N.Y. 1933)   Cited 3 times

    January 24, 1933. Oliver D. Burden, U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y. (Roger O. Baldwin, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel), for the United States. Wm. Rosenzweig, of New York City, for petitioner. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States, on the relation of Antonino Sollano, on behalf of Salvator Sollano, an alien, against Wm. Doak, Commissioner of Labor, and W.W. Hull, Commissioner of Immigration. Writ dismissed and the alien remanded to custody of the immigration authorities. Affirmed

  7. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,770 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  8. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,155 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  9. Section 1111 - Murder

    18 U.S.C. § 1111   Cited 2,119 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Punishing homicide "[w]ithin the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States"

  10. Section 1112 - Manslaughter

    18 U.S.C. § 1112   Cited 553 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Delimiting voluntary manslaughter to acts committed in the heat of passion

  11. Section 1251a - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1251a   Cited 8 times

    8 U.S.C. § 1251a Pub. L. 87-301, §24(a)(3), Sept. 26, 1961, 75 Stat. 657 Section, Pub. L. 85-316, §7, Sept. 11, 1957, 71 Stat. 640, excepted spouse, child or parent of a United States citizen, and aliens admitted between Dec. 22, 1945, and Nov. 1, 1954, inclusive, who misrepresented their nationality, place of birth, identity or residence, provided this latter group did so misrepresent because of fear of persecution because of race, religion or politics if repatriated and not to evade quota restrictions