§
In the Matter of S

15 Cited authorities

  1. Schneiderman v. United States

    320 U.S. 118 (1943)   Cited 535 times
    Holding citizenship “should not be taken away without the clearest sort of justification and proof,” and that proof cannot “leave the issue in doubt”

  2. Baumgartner v. United States

    322 U.S. 665 (1944)   Cited 280 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (1944), the issue was whether or not the findings of the two lower courts satisfied the clear-and-convincing standard of proof necessary to sustain a denaturalization decree.

  3. Nishikawa v. Dulles

    356 U.S. 129 (1958)   Cited 89 times
    Holding that, in the face of congressional silence on the question, proof of an act of expatriation must be by clear and convincing evidence

  4. Perez v. Brownell

    356 U.S. 44 (1958)   Cited 79 times
    In Perez the contention that § 401(e) was penal in character was impliedly rejected by the Court's holding, based on legislative history totally different from that underlying §§ 401(j) and 349(a) (10), that voting in a political election in a foreign state "is regulable by Congress under its power to deal with foreign affairs."

  5. Savorgnan v. United States

    338 U.S. 491 (1950)   Cited 94 times
    In Savorgnan v. United States, 338 U.S. 491, an American citizen had renounced her citizenship and acquired that of a foreign state.

  6. Mandoli v. Acheson

    344 U.S. 133 (1952)   Cited 40 times
    Finding involuntary the entry of the plaintiff-who was 23 or 24 years old at the time-into the Italian army, reasoning that "'[t]he choice of taking the oath or violating the law was, for a soldier in the army of Fascist Italy, no choice at all'"

  7. Mackenzie v. Hare

    239 U.S. 299 (1915)   Cited 89 times
    In Mackenzie exactly the same argument was made that appellant urges here. Indeed, the Court uses the same opinion in this case to strike down § 352(a)(1) as was urged in Mackenzie, namely, Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat. 738 (1824), where Chief Justice Marshall remarked: "The constitution does not authorize Congress to enlarge or abridge... [the] rights" of citizens.

  8. Lee You Fee v. Dulles

    355 U.S. 61 (1957)   Cited 2 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 58. Decided November 18, 1957. Upon consideration of the record and the confession of error by the Solicitor General, the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its order dismissing the complaint. 236 F.2d 885, reversed and remanded. Jack Wasserman for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack

  9. Bauer v. Clark

    161 F.2d 397 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 38 times

    No. 9162. February 15, 1947. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1947. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division; Walter C. Lindley, Judge. Action by Frederick E. Bauer against Tom C. Clark, in his capacities as Attorney General of and as the executive officer of the Department of Justice of the United States of America, for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff is a national of the United States. From a decree dismissing the complaint for

  10. Gonzales v. Landon

    215 F.2d 955 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920, we held that the rule as to burden of proof in denaturalization cases applied to expatriation cases under Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940.

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,773 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"