§

In the Matter of Rivero-Diaz

12 I&N Dec. 475 (B.I.A. 1967)
In the Matter of Rivero-Diaz

7 Cited authorities

  1. Shaughnessy v. Mezei

    345 U.S. 206 (1953)   Cited 632 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an excluded alien's indefinite detention on Ellis Island did not violate constitutional law because “he is treated as if he stopped at the border”

  2. The Chinese Exclusion Case

    130 U.S. 581 (1889)   Cited 224 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Congress's constitutionally devised powers to control immigration, among other powers, are "restricted in their exercise only by the constitution itself and considerations of public policy and justice which control, more or less, the conduct of all civilized nations"

  3. Ahrens v. Rojas

    292 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 23 times

    No. 18955. June 30, 1961. Paul E. Gifford, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Douglas P. Lillis, Regional Counsel, I. N. Service, Richmond, Va., for appellant. Monroe Gelb, Miami, Fla., for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DE VANE, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. In an action brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201, and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, the district court entered a final judgment that the plaintiff-appellee

  4. United States v. Murff

    260 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1958)   Cited 23 times
    In United States ex rel. Paktorovics v. Murff, 260 F.2d 610 (2d Cir. 1958), the court found that while the President alone lacked authority to create a legally enforceable right to enter this country, nonetheless an immigrant who travelled here upon an invitation issued "pursuant to the announced foreign policy of the United States as formulated by the President" and who was detained at Ellis Island was at the least entitled to a hearing before revocation of parole.

  5. Fok Yung Yo v. United States

    185 U.S. 296 (1902)   Cited 35 times
    In Fok Young Yo v. United States, 185 U.S. 296, 304, 305, it was held that the decision of the collector of customs on the right of transit across the territory of the United States was conclusive, and, still more to the point, in Lem Moon Sing v. United States, 158 U.S. 538, where the petitioner for habeas corpus alleged facts which, if true, gave him a right to enter and remain in the country, it was held that the decision of the collector was final as to whether or not he belonged to the privileged class.

  6. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,849 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  7. Section 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1226   Cited 3,201 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that no court may set aside an immigration judge's "discretionary judgment any action or decision . . . regarding the detention or release of any alien or the grant, revocation, or denial of bond or parole"