In the Matter of Ramirez-Sanchez

15 Cited authorities

  1. Woodby v. Immigration Service

    385 U.S. 276 (1966)   Cited 746 times
    Holding that "no deportation order may be entered unless it is found by clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that the facts alleged as grounds for deportation are true"
  2. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."
  3. Hoonsilapa v. Immigra. and Natural. Service

    575 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 46 times
    Holding there is no sanction when illegal arrest only leads to discovery of person's identity and that merely leads to other independent evidence
  4. Katris v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    562 F.2d 866 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that failure to disclose adverse controlling authority, when counsel had worked on precedential case, merited sanctions
  5. Guan Chow Tok v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    538 F.2d 36 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 15 times
    Construing Francis
  6. Marlowe v. United States Immig. Nat. Serv

    457 F.2d 1314 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 15 times
    Finding admission of an investigative report without accompanying foundation testimony from live witnesses to be fundamentally fair in an immigration proceeding
  7. Smith v. Immigration Naturalization Serv

    585 F.2d 600 (3d Cir. 1978)   Cited 7 times

    No. 77-2574. Argued September 29, 1978. Decided November 1, 1978. Richard D. Steel, Wasserman, Orlow, Ginsberg Rubin, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioners. Philip Wilens, Chief, Government Regulations Labor, Section, Crim. Div., James P. Morris, Atty., Chester J. Halicki, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Before ROSENN and WEIS, Circuit Judges, and FISHER, District Judge. Clarkson S. Fisher

  8. Medina-Sandoval v. Immigration Nat. Serv

    524 F.2d 658 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times

    No. 74-3319. October 10, 1975. David F. Aberson (argued), Encino, Cal., for petitioner. James R. Dooley, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and WOLLENBERG, District Judge. Honorable Albert C. Wollenberg, Northern District of California, sitting by designation. OPINION PER CURIAM: While walking to a restaurant in Pasadena, California, at 6:30 a.m., Medina-Sandoval was stopped by immigration officers and asked whether he had his

  9. Wong Chung Che v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    565 F.2d 166 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 7 times
    In Wong Chung Che, 565 F.2d at 166, one of the petitioners, Wong Pui Tong, alleged that he had been illegally arrested and searched and that his Crewman's Landing Permit had been seized from his home without his consent or a search warrant.
  10. Guzman-Flores v. U.S. Immigration Nat. Serv

    496 F.2d 1245 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 7 times

    No. 73-1313, 73-1525. Heard April 9, 1974. Decided May 28, 1974. Ralph M. Schelly, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Mary Jo Grotenrath, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James R. Thompson, U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Petition for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before SWYGERT, Chief Judge, SPRECHER, Circuit Judge and NOLAND, District Judge District Judge James E. Noland of the Southern District of Indiana is sitting by designation. NOLAND, District Judge. These

  11. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  12. Section 287.6 - Proof of official records

    8 C.F.R. § 287.6   Cited 183 times
    Setting forth the appropriate procedure by which a record is certified by a Canadian governmental entity
  13. Section 287.3 - Disposition of cases of aliens arrested without warrant

    8 C.F.R. § 287.3   Cited 148 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that an alien arrested without a warrant and placed in formal proceedings be apprised of the reason for his arrest, his right to representation, and that any statement he makes may be used against him in a subsequent proceeding
  14. Section 103.7 - [Effective until 4/1/2024] Fees

    8 C.F.R. § 103.7   Cited 44 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing the INS to charge a processing fee for formal applications or petitions