In the Matter of R---- S

5 Cited authorities

  1. Crowell v. Benson

    285 U.S. 22 (1932)   Cited 1,284 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the LHWCA withstood various constitutional challenges and stating that the "such claim" language in § 919 meant "the claim for compensation under the [LHWCA] and by its explicit provisions is that of an `employee,' as defined in the [LHWCA], against his `employer'"
  2. Vajtauer v. Comm'r of Immigration

    273 U.S. 103 (1927)   Cited 433 times
    Holding that deportation "on charges unsupported by any evidence is a denial of due process which may be corrected on habeas corpus"
  3. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."
  4. Caetano v. Shaughnessy

    133 F. Supp. 211 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)   Cited 2 times

    July 29, 1955. Nemeroff, Jelline, Danzig Paley, New York City, Aaron L. Danzig, New York City, of counsel, for petitioner. J. Edward Lumbard, U.S. Atty., New York City, Eliot H. Lumbard and Lester Friedman, New York City, of counsel, for respondent. BICKS, District Judge. On the ground that after admission to the United States as a visitor for pleasure petitioner failed to comply with the conditions of such status, the Immigration and Naturalization Service ordered his deportation. Petitioner thereupon

  5. Section 1361 - Burden of proof upon alien

    8 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 317 times
    Providing that the burden of proof to show time, place, and manner of entry into the United States shifts to the alien once alienage is established