§
In the Matter of R

11 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Tucker Truck Lines

    344 U.S. 33 (1952)   Cited 955 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court "is not bound by a prior exercise of jurisdiction in a case where it was not questioned and was passed sub silentio"

  2. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude

  3. Harisiades v. Shaughnessy

    342 U.S. 580 (1952)   Cited 561 times
    Holding that the Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to deportation orders because "[d]eportation, however severe its consequences, has been consistently classified as a civil rather than a criminal procedure"

  4. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath

    339 U.S. 33 (1950)   Cited 443 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not

  5. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions

  6. United States v. Smith

    289 U.S. 422 (1933)   Cited 85 times
    Counterfeiting ranks as a crime of moral turpitude

  7. Keegan v. United States

    325 U.S. 478 (1945)   Cited 40 times
    In Keegan v. United States, 325 U.S. 478, 506, 65 S.Ct. 1203, 1215, 89 L.Ed. 1745, Chief Justice Stone observed that "The doctrine of People v. Powell, 63 N.Y. 88, on which petitioners rely, that a criminal conspiracy to do an act `innocent in itself' not known by the conspirators to be prohibited must be actuated by some corrupt motive other than the intention to do the act which is prohibited and which is the object of the conspiracy, has never been accepted by this Court."

  8. United States v. Cohn

    270 U.S. 339 (1926)   Cited 75 times
    In Cohn the Court expressly rejected the Government's argument that Congress intended the 1918 Act to go beyond merely protecting the Government from being cheated out of its own money or property, and in addition intended it to protect the Government from the interference with and obstruction of any of its lawful functions by deceitful or fraudulent means.

  9. Cahill v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation

    57 F. Supp. 614 (W.D. Ky. 1944)   Cited 13 times

    No. 688. November 3, 1944. Herbert H. Monsky, of Louisville, Ky., for Frank R. Cahill, Jr. Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., Eli H. Brown, III, U.S. Atty., of Louisville, Ky., Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Jess G. Schiffmann, Atty., Department of Justice, of New York City, for United States of America. Squire R. Ogden, of Louisville, Ky., Kenneth M. Spence, of New York City, Ogden, Galphin, Tarrant Street, of Louisville, Ky., and Spence, Windels, Walser, Hotchkiss Angell, of New

  10. In re Pontarelli

    65 N.E.2d 83 (Ill. 1946)   Cited 10 times

    No. 29271. Respondent disbarred. Opinion filed March 20, 1946 PROCEEDING to disbar. CHARLES LEVITON, of Chicago, amicus curiae. JOHN J. MOSER, and GEORGE A. BOSOMBURG, both of Chicago, for respondent. Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the court: On May 12, 1943, an indictment was returned in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois against George Ferdinand Pontarelli, charging him with violating the provisions of the Selective