§
In the Matter of R

6 Cited authorities

  1. State v. Shelbrick

    33 N.J. Super. 7 (App. Div. 1954)   Cited 20 times

    Argued October 25, 1954 — Decided November 4, 1954. On appeal from New Jersey Courts. Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS. Mr. John M. Pillsbury, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. J. Victor Carton, Monmouth County Prosecutor). Mr. Benjamin I. Kantor argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Edward Farry, Jr., and J. Franklin Cuttrell, attorneys). The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D. Defendant was found guilty "as charged" under an indictment

  2. State v. Todaro

    131 N.J.L. 430 (N.J. 1944)   Cited 13 times
    In State v. Todoro, 131 N.J.L. 430 (E. A. 1944), app. dism. 323 U.S. 667, 65 S.Ct. 73, 89 L.Ed. 542 (1944), our then highest court, in reviewing the constitutionality of the statutory presumption, declared that the presumption enlarged the common law rule "that when the corpus delecti has been proved, if the stolen goods are shown to have been in the possession of the defendant after, or recently after the theft, the burden of proof reverts to the defendant to explain possession...."

  3. State v. Lisena

    129 N.J.L. 569 (N.J. 1943)   Cited 14 times
    In State v. Lisena, 129 N.J.L. 569, this court held to the contrary and the Court of Errors and Appeals affirmed that holding. It is also urged that the court erred in denying the plaintiff in error's motion for a direction of verdict of acquittal.

  4. State v. Block

    119 N.J.L. 277 (N.J. 1938)   Cited 17 times
    In State v. Block, 119 N.J.L. 277, 282 (Sup. Ct. 1938), it was held that conviction as a disorderly person is not a conviction of crime for the purpose of impeaching the credibility of a witness.

  5. State v. Giordano

    121 N.J.L. 469 (N.J. 1939)   Cited 15 times

    Submitted October 4, 1938 — Decided January 3, 1939. 1. Plaintiff in error was convicted for unlawfully receiving stolen property in violation of R.S. 2:164-1, providing that possession within a year from the date of the crime shall be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction. Held, that the statute does no more than to make possession of the prohibited article prima facie evidence of guilt, which presumption, like other presumptions, may be overcome by countervailing proof to the contrary;

  6. Palmer v. State

    287 P. 1112 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)   Cited 1 times

    No. A-7319. Opinion Filed May 10, 1930. Appeal from District Court, Choctaw County; Earl Welch, Judge. Plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and appeals. Affirmed. Howe Douglass, for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General, for the State. PER CURIAM. Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Choctaw county on a charge of burglary in the second degree, and his punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period