In the Matter of R

4 Cited authorities

  1. Commonwealth v. Broadland

    315 Mass. 20 (Mass. 1943)   Cited 27 times

    October 25, 1943. November 29, 1943. Present: FIELD, C.J., DONAHUE, DOLAN, COX, RONAN, JJ. Indecent Exposure. A defendant, charged by a complaint in the form set out in § 79 of G.L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 277, with the common law offence of indecent exposure of his person in a public place, properly might be convicted upon evidence of an intentional act of such exposure although there was no evidence that he was seen in such act by more than one person. COMPLAINT, received and sworn to in the Third District

  2. People v. Ring

    267 Mich. 657 (Mich. 1934)   Cited 25 times

    Docket No. 156, Calendar No. 37,686. Submitted April 12, 1934. Decided June 4, 1934. Appeal from Allegan; Miles (Fred T.), J. Submitted April 12, 1934. (Docket No. 156, Calendar No. 37,686.) Decided June 4, 1934. Fred L. Ring was convicted of designedly making an open, indecent and obscene exposure of his person and of the persons of others in violation of Act No. 328, Pub. Acts 1931, § 335. Affirmed. Clare E. Hoffman, for appellant. Patrick H. O'Brien, Attorney General, and Welborne S. Luna, Prosecuting

  3. People v. DeVine

    261 N.W. 101 (Mich. 1935)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that an act of indecent exposure occurring on the front porch of a private dwelling that was frequented by neighbor children was done in a public place
  4. People v. Kratz

    230 Mich. 334 (Mich. 1925)   Cited 16 times
    In Kratz, the statute provided, "If any man or woman, married or unmarried,... shall designedly make any open, indecent or obscene exposure of his or her person,... every such person shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail."