§

In the Matter of Quijencio

15 I&N Dec. 95 (B.I.A. 1974)
In the Matter of Quijencio

9 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Philips Corp.

    414 U.S. 5 (1973)   Cited 202 times
    Holding that estoppel did not toll the Act's statutory deadline

  2. Rabang v. Boyd

    353 U.S. 427 (1957)   Cited 16 times
    Rejecting argument that Congress did not have authority to alter the immigration status of persons born in the Philippines

  3. Manlangit v. United States Dept. of Justice

    488 F.2d 1073 (4th Cir. 1973)   Cited 1 times
    Holding that Afroyim addressed the rights of a naturalized American citizen and therefore does not stand as a bar to Congress' authority to revoke the non-citizen, "national" status of the Philippine inhabitants

  4. GAMERO v. IMMIGRATION NAT. SERV., LA DIST

    367 F.2d 123 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 5 times

    No. 20137. September 6, 1966. Rehearing Denied October 25, 1966. John F. Sheffield, Norman B. Silver, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant. Manuel L. Real, U.S. Atty., Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Chief, Civ. Div., Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees. Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG, and ELY, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge: Appellant is an alien who attacks an order of exclusion and deportation issued by a Special Inquiry Officer of the Immigration and

  5. Santos v. U.S. Immigration and Nat. Serv

    421 F.2d 1303 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    No. 23160. February 13, 1970. Norman Stiller (argued), of Faulkner, Sheehan Wiseman, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. David R. Urdan (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, Atty. Gen. of the U.S., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before MADDEN, Judge of the United States Court of Claims; MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. Senior Judge, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation

  6. Barrese v. Ryan

    203 F. Supp. 880 (D. Conn. 1962)   Cited 7 times
    Rejecting the Board's interpretation of this statute that "single scheme" must be equated with "one criminal episode"

  7. United States v. Day

    21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927)   Cited 19 times
    In Lesto v. Day, 21 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1927), the court concluded that in order for a visit abroad to be considered temporary, an immigrant must maintain a domicile in the United States and must show an intention to return to the United States in a short time.

  8. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,159 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  9. Section 101.1 - Presumption of lawful admission

    8 C.F.R. § 101.1   Cited 4 times

    A member of the following classes shall be presumed to have been lawfully admitted for permanent residence even though a record of his admission cannot be found, except as otherwise provided in this section, unless he abandoned his lawful permanent resident status or subsequently lost that status by operation of law: (a)Prior to June 30, 1906. An alien who establishes that he entered the United States prior to June 30, 1906. (b)United States land borders. An alien who establishes that, while a citizen