§

In the Matter of Pearson

13 I&N Dec. 152 (B.I.A. 1969)
In the Matter of Pearson

2 Cited authorities

  1. Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel

    16 N.Y.2d 64 (N.Y. 1965)   Cited 77 times
    In Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel, 1965, 16 N.Y.2d 64, 262 N.Y.S.2d 86, 209 N.E.2d 709, 13 A.L.R.3d 1401, cert. den. 384 U.S. 971, 86 S.Ct. 1861, 16 L.Ed.2d 682, the Court of Appeals of New York was presented with the question whether such a bilateral divorce granted in the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, was entitled to recognition in New York State.

  2. Bates v. Bates

    292 P. 298 (Nev. 1930)   Cited 5 times

    No. 2881 October 29, 1930. APPEAL from Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Thomas F. Moran, Judge. Thatcher Woodburn, for Appellant: Under the principles of international comity, and by the rules laid down in most American jurisdictions, the decree of the English court is entitled to recognition in the courts of Nevada, unless a lack of jurisdiction appears on the face of the record; and unless such lack of jurisdiction appears, Mr. Bates is bound by the decree of that court as to all