In the Matter of Parodi

17 Cited authorities

  1. Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelder

    425 U.S. 185 (1976)   Cited 3,485 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 9(f) “contains a state-of-mind condition requiring something more than negligence”
  2. Jordan v. De George

    341 U.S. 223 (1951)   Cited 711 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defrauding the United States of tax on distilled spirits is a serious crime involving moral turpitude
  3. Burns v. Alcala

    420 U.S. 575 (1975)   Cited 185 times
    Stating "that words used in a statute are to be given their ordinary meaning"
  4. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions
  5. Kelly v. United States

    531 F.2d 1144 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 56 times
    Holding that operations of the Coast Guard bear a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity
  6. Velez-Lozano v. I. N. S

    463 F.2d 1305 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 26 times
    Sustaining a deportation order based solely upon a conviction for consensual sodomy
  7. Hamid v. U.S. I. N. S

    538 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 16 times
    In Hamid, we reasoned that even if the petitioner's conduct did not itself qualify as trafficking, it "provided a sound basis to believe that petitioner was a 'trafficker'" Id. at 1391.
  8. Tibke v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

    335 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that adjustment of status was permitted even if deportable alien had entered the country as a lawful permanent resident
  9. Campos v. U.S. INS

    402 F.2d 758 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times
    In Campos v. U.S. Immigration Naturalization Service, 402 F.2d 758 (9th Cir. 1968), this court interpreted Section 212(a)(4) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(4), to apply to both adjustment of status and entry.
  10. Marin v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    438 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1971)   Cited 4 times

    No. 25625. February 24, 1971. Donald L. Ungar (argued) of Phelan, Simmons Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. David R. Urdan, Chief U.S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Stephen M. Suffin, Atty., I.N.S., San Francisco, Cal., John N. Mitchell, U.S. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWNING and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Honorable William M. Byrne, Senior Judge. United States District Court for the Central District

  11. Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

    18 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 21,467 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"
  12. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,717 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"
  13. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,834 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists
  14. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable
  15. Section 472 - Uttering counterfeit obligations or securities

    18 U.S.C. § 472   Cited 1,154 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Passing or attempting to pass counterfeit currency
  16. Section 1254 - Repealed

    8 U.S.C. § 1254   Cited 1,130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing suspension-of-deportation eligibility