§
IN THE MATTER OF PANG

10 Cited authorities

  1. Escobedo v. Illinois

    378 U.S. 478 (1964)   Cited 4,237 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a suspect is interrogated with the goal of eliciting incriminating statements and the suspect has not been warned about his or her right to remain silent, the denial of the opportunity to consult with the suspect's attorney is a violation of the Sixth Amendment

  2. Massiah v. United States

    377 U.S. 201 (1964)   Cited 2,730 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant's Sixth Amendment rights are violated when the government deploys an informant to interrogate the defendant following indictment

  3. Marcello v. Bonds

    349 U.S. 302 (1955)   Cited 253 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it does not violate due process to have an adjudicator who is "subject to the supervision and control of officials in the Immigration Service charged with investigative and prosecuting functions"

  4. Ah Chiu Pang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    368 F.2d 637 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that once the government proves alienage, "the burden shift to the [alien] to justify his presence in the United States"

  5. Williams v. Butterfield

    145 F. Supp. 567 (E.D. Mich. 1956)   Cited 18 times

    Civ. A. No. 13973. October 17, 1956. Goodman, Crockett, Eden Robb, Geo. W. Crockett, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff. Fred W. Kaess, U.S. Atty., Dwight K. Hamborsky, Ass't U.S. Atty., Detroit. Mich., for defendant. THORNTON, District Judge. The matter before the Court is a review of an Order of Deportation wherein the only question involved is whether the administrative finding of alienage is one which this Court may set aside. Plaintiff was arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by defendant in

  6. United States v. O'Rourke

    211 F.2d 609 (8th Cir. 1954)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14978. April 21, 1954. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1954. James Daleo, Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo. (Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., and William O. Russell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Joplin, Mo., on the brief), for appellee. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. Nicolo Impastato, an alien in custody under a warrant of deportation issued July 22, 1953, petitioned the District Court for

  7. Vlisidis v. Holland

    150 F. Supp. 678 (E.D. Pa. 1957)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. Nos. 21438, 21463. April 18, 1957. Judgment Affirmed July 3, 1957. J. J. Kilimnik, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. W. Wilson White, U.S. Atty., Louis C. Bechtle, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Gilbert Zimmerman, Regional Counsel, Southeast Region Immigration Naturalization Service, Richmond, Va., of counsel, for defendant. LORD, District Judge. These are like civil actions for declaratory judgments and judicial review. The plaintiffs have been found to be aliens subject to deportation

  8. Petition for Review of Da Silva Pereira v. Murff

    169 F. Supp. 81 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)   Cited 1 times

    December 26, 1958. Nemeroff, Jelline, Danzig Paley, New York City, for petitioner, by Morton Silfen, New York City, of counsel. Arthur H. Christy, U.S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of New York, New York City, for respondent, by Roy Babitt, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, of counsel. IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge. By this motion, brought under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the District Director of Immigration and Naturalization seeks summary judgment dismissing

  9. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

  10. Section 1361 - Burden of proof upon alien

    8 U.S.C. § 1361   Cited 317 times
    Providing that the burden of proof to show time, place, and manner of entry into the United States shifts to the alien once alienage is established