In the Matter of P---- R

8 Cited authorities

Schneiderman v. United States
320 U.S. 118 (1943) Cited 535 times
Holding citizenship “should not be taken away without the clearest sort of justification and proof,” and that proof cannot “leave the issue in doubt”
Baumgartner v. United States
322 U.S. 665 (1944) Cited 279 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (1944), the issue was whether or not the findings of the two lower courts satisfied the clear-and-convincing standard of proof necessary to sustain a denaturalization decree.
Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez
362 U.S. 384 (1960) Cited 15 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Mackey, the Court remanded to the district court "to put in issue the question of collateral estoppel and to obtain an adjudication upon it."
Gonzales v. Landon
215 F.2d 955 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 27 times
In Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920, we held that the rule as to burden of proof in denaturalization cases applied to expatriation cases under Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940.
United States v. Jordan
164 F.2d 633 (7th Cir. 1948) Cited 13 times
No. 9296. December 9, 1947. Rehearing Denied January 16, 1948. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Elwyn R. Shaw, Judge. Habeas corpus proceedings by the United States of America, on the relation of Peter Schlimmgen, against Andrew Jordan, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice. From an adverse order, the District Director of Immigration and Naturalization appeals. Reversed
United States v. Karnuth
31 F. Supp. 799 (W.D.N.Y. 1940) Cited 8 times
No. 347. February 1, 1940. William H. Jones and Donald Bain, both of Buffalo, N.Y., for petitioner. George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., of Buffalo, N.Y. (Joseph J. Doran, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Rochester, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Proceeding by the United States of America, on the relation of Adonai J.L. Chartrand, for a writ of habeas corpus directed to Arthur J. Karnuth, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Buffalo, N Y Writ dismissed. KNIGHT, District Judge. This proceeding
United States v. Reimer
108 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1940) Cited 4 times
No. 179. January 8, 1940. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States of America, on the relation of Michael Tsevdos, against Rudolph Reimer, Commissioner of Immigration. From an order dismissing a writ of habeas corpus and remanding relator to custody for deportation, the relator appeals. Affirmed. John S. Wise, Jr., of New York City, for appellant. John T. Cahill, U.S. Atty., of New York City (John B. Creegan
Section 1251 - Transferred
8 U.S.C. § 1251 Cited 2,155 times 1 Legal Analyses
Delineating crimes that make alien deportable

In the Matter of P---- R

8 Cited authorities

Holding citizenship “should not be taken away without the clearest sort of justification and proof,” and that proof cannot “leave the issue in doubt”

In Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (1944), the issue was whether or not the findings of the two lower courts satisfied the clear-and-convincing standard of proof necessary to sustain a denaturalization decree.

In Mackey, the Court remanded to the district court "to put in issue the question of collateral estoppel and to obtain an adjudication upon it."

In Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920, we held that the rule as to burden of proof in denaturalization cases applied to expatriation cases under Section 401(j) of the Nationality Act of 1940.

Delineating crimes that make alien deportable