Submitted May term, 1947. Decided September 12th, 1947. 1. The evidence of appellant's adultery is convincing and of a character to leave the court free of any doubt. 2. The admission of the testimony of appellant's desertion occurred in most cases because no objection was made thereto. Held, there was no reversible error in this respect. 3. Appellant's briefs impugn the motives and conduct of the Advisory Master without justification. They will be stricken from the files of this court and are not
11-24-1913 LEECH v. LEECH. Joseph Beck Tyler, of Camden, for petitioner. Scovel & Harding, of Camden, for defendant and cross-petitioner. LEAMING, V. C. Petition by Charles W. Leech against Sarah E. Leech for divorce, in which defendant filed an answer and cross-petition. Petition dismissed, and decree in favor of cross-petitioner. Petitioner seeks a divorce against his wife for desertion. The petition alleges that his wife deserted him by permanently leaving his home December 10, 1908, and that