§
IN THE MATTER OF ONAL

16 Cited authorities

  1. U.S. Philips Corp.

    414 U.S. 5 (1973)   Cited 199 times
    Holding that estoppel did not toll the Act's statutory deadline

  2. Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.

    478 F.2d 562 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that the three-year delay in filing motion to disqualify was "not extraordinary" enough to deny motion

  3. Boone v. Mechanical Specialities

    609 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times
    Finding prejudice where defendant's witnesses no longer available due to the passage of time

  4. Van Bourg v. Nitze

    388 F.2d 557 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 52 times
    Finding that "post hoc rationalizations cannot suffice" to justify decision of a naval review board where the board failed to set forth "the basis for its conclusion" as required by naval regulations

  5. Akers v. State Marine Lines, Inc.

    344 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 52 times

    No. 21698. April 13, 1965. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1965. W. Jiles Roberts, Houston, Tex., for appellant. George H. Kolb, Frank G. Harmon, Houston, Tex., Baker, Botts, Shepherd Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellees. Before HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge, WHITAKER, Senior Judge, and RIVES, Circuit Judge. Of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation. HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from the district court's entry of summary judgment dismissing Appellant's libel. I. At

  6. Madany v. Smith

    696 F.2d 1008 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times
    Using an abuse of discretion standard for former 8 U.S.C. § 1153, now § 1153(b)

  7. Stewart Infra-Red Commissary, Etc. v. Coomey

    661 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 3 times
    Holding that, where applicable, the terms of the labor certification are binding on the agency in terms of which qualifications need to be shown

  8. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,718 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  9. Section 1255 - Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence

    8 U.S.C. § 1255   Cited 2,836 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Listing classes of nonimmigrants, such as students and tourists

  10. Section 1154 - Procedure for granting immigrant status

    8 U.S.C. § 1154   Cited 1,099 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting immigrant status

  11. Section 1256 - Rescission of adjustment of status; effect upon naturalized citizen

    8 U.S.C. § 1256   Cited 118 times
    Providing for rescission of adjusted status if within five years it appears the alien "was not in fact eligible for such adjustment of status" when it was granted

  12. Section 204.1 - General information about immediate relative and family-sponsored petitions

    8 C.F.R. § 204.1   Cited 258 times
    Delimiting jurisdiction over immediate relative and family-sponsored visa petitions

  13. Section 656.30 - Validity of and invalidation of labor certifications

    20 C.F.R. § 656.30   Cited 39 times

    (a)Priority date. (1) The filing date for a Schedule A occupation or sheepherders is the date the application was dated by the Immigration Officer. (2) The filing date, established under § 656.17(c) , of an approved labor certification may be used as a priority date by the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State, as appropriate. (b)Expiration of labor certifications. For certifications resulting from applications filed under this part and 20 CFR part 656 in effect prior to March

  14. Section 246.1 - Notice

    8 C.F.R. § 246.1   Cited 25 times
    Implementing 8 U.S.C. § 1256

  15. Section 656.24 - Labor certification determinations

    20 C.F.R. § 656.24   Cited 22 times
    Describing narrow exceptions to the general prohibition on the submission of evidence in support of a request for reconsideration

  16. Section 246.3 - Allegations contested or denied; hearing requested

    8 C.F.R. § 246.3   Cited 10 times

    If, within the prescribed time following service of the notice pursuant to § 246.1 , the respondent has filed an answer which contests or denies any allegation in the notice, or a hearing is requested, a hearing pursuant to § 246.5 shall be conducted by an immigration judge, and the requirements contained in §§ 240.3 , 240.4 , 240.5 , 240.6 , 240.7 , and 240.9 of this chapter shall be followed. 8 C.F.R. §246.3