§
IN THE MATTER OF OKOH

12 Cited authorities

  1. Roldan v. Racette

    984 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 3,199 times
    Holding that INA § 106(c) is a "clear jurisdictional bar, and admits of no exceptions"

  2. Landon v. Plasencia

    459 U.S. 21 (1982)   Cited 624 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such aliens are entitled to protections of Due Process Clause in exclusion proceedings

  3. Castaneda v. I.N.S.

    23 F.3d 1576 (10th Cir. 1994)   Cited 540 times
    Recognizing federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and may only exercise jurisdiction when specifically authorized to do so

  4. Mendez v. Immigration Natur. Service

    563 F.2d 956 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that the failure to notify alien's counsel of an order to appear for deportation violated the alien's statutory right to counsel

  5. Marrero v. I.N.S.

    990 F.2d 772 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Adopting middle ground, holding court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order of deportation after the alien has been forcibly deported if the record reveals a "colorable" due process claim

  6. Quezada v. I.N.S.

    898 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 22 times

    No. 89-1857. April 18, 1990. R. David Benavides, John Wheat Gibson, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. James Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sp. Asst., Marvin Collins, Myrna Silen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Ronald C. Chandler, Dist. Director, INS, Dallas, Tex., John B.Z. Chaplinger, Dist. Director, INS, New Orleans, La., for other Interested Parties. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH

  7. Saadi v. Immigration and Naturalization Serv

    912 F.2d 428 (10th Cir. 1990)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1105a are mandatory and jurisdictional

  8. Joehar v. I.N.S.

    957 F.2d 887 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Declining to consider the Mendez exception in respect to an alien who had departed voluntarily

  9. Juarez v. I.N.S.

    732 F.2d 58 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 14 times
    In Juarez v. INS, 732 F.2d 58 (6th Cir. 1984), and Luna-Benalcazar, 414 F.2d at 254, petitioners' appeal to this Court was from a denial of a motion to reopen deportation proceedings.

  10. McGuire v. United States I.N.S. Dist. Director

    804 F. Supp. 1229 (N.D. Cal. 1992)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that Congress' goal to reduce the ad ministrative burdens associated with the visa requirement, along with the potential for abuse of the VWP program, provided a rational basis for requiring an alien to waive his rights to contest removal based on a violation of the terms of his stay

  11. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,977 times   73 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  12. Section 1105a - Employment authorization for battered spouses of certain nonimmigrants

    8 U.S.C. § 1105a   Cited 2,576 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring appellate courts to uphold the Board's conclusions if "supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record as a whole"