§
In the Matter of O

16 Cited authorities

  1. Carlson v. Landon

    342 U.S. 524 (1952)   Cited 632 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mandatory detention of Communist noncitizens in removal proceedings does not violate the Due Process Clause

  2. Orloff v. Willoughby

    345 U.S. 83 (1953)   Cited 606 times
    Holding that commissioning of officers in the Army was a matter of discretion within the province of the President

  3. Caminetti v. United States

    242 U.S. 470 (1917)   Cited 1,913 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that importation of a woman for immoral purposes may constitutionally be regulated even when it is not for material gain

  4. Kunz v. New York

    340 U.S. 290 (1951)   Cited 330 times
    Holding denial of permit to engage in outdoor religious activity based on earlier revocation of speech permit, where administrative officer had unbounded discretion, was impermissible prior restraint

  5. United States v. Kahriger

    345 U.S. 22 (1953)   Cited 218 times
    Upholding tax on bookmakers and stating, “It is conceded that a federal excise tax does not cease to be valid merely because it discourages or deters the activities taxed.”

  6. Vajtauer v. Comm'r of Immigration

    273 U.S. 103 (1927)   Cited 436 times
    Holding that deportation "on charges unsupported by any evidence is a denial of due process which may be corrected on habeas corpus"

  7. United States ex rel. Bilokumsky v. Tod

    263 U.S. 149 (1923)   Cited 345 times
    Holding that there is no "presumption of citizenship comparable to the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. . . . To defeat deportation it is not always enough for the person arrested to stand mute at the hearing and put the Government upon its proof."

  8. Raffel v. United States

    271 U.S. 494 (1926)   Cited 279 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fifth Amendment "immunity from giving testimony is one which the defendant may waive by offering himself as a witness"

  9. Brown v. Walker

    161 U.S. 591 (1896)   Cited 610 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Brown v. Walker, 161 U.S. 591 (1896), a witness raised the issue, claiming the privilege in a federal proceeding based on his fear of prosecution by a State, but we found that a statute under which immunity from federal prosecution had been conferred provided for immunity from state prosecution as well, obviating any need to reach the issue raised.

  10. Western Air Lines v. Pub. Uti. Commn

    342 U.S. 908 (1952)   Cited 19 times

    No. 465. January 7, 1952, October TERM, 1951. Appeals from the Supreme Court of California. Per Curiam: The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE BURTON are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted. Oscar A. Trippet and Paul M. Godehn for appellant in No. 464. Hugh W. Darling for appellant in No. 465. Everett C. McKeage for appellee.

  11. Section 3481 - Competency of accused

    18 U.S.C. § 3481   Cited 202 times
    Authorizing accused to testify at his own request