§
In the Matter of O

13 Cited authorities

  1. Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan

    333 U.S. 6 (1948)   Cited 206 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting government's definition of provision authorizing deportation for multiple criminal convictions

  2. State v. Jones

    133 S.C. 167 (S.C. 1925)   Cited 75 times
    Recognizing that offense of "assault and battery with intent to kill and murder" contained "all the elements of murder except the death of the party assailed"

  3. People v. Campbell

    237 Mich. 424 (Mich. 1927)   Cited 60 times

    Docket No. 126. Submitted October 15, 1926. Decided February 4, 1927. Exceptions before judgment from Ottawa; Cross (Orien S.), J. Submitted October 15, 1926. (Docket No. 126.) Decided February 4, 1927. Kenneth Campbell was convicted of negligent homicide under Act No. 98, Pub. Acts 1921. Reversed. Louis H. Osterhous and Gerrit J. Diekema, for appellant. Andrew B. Dougherty, Attorney General, and Fred T. Miles, Prosecuting Attorney, for the people. McDONALD, J. The defendant was convicted of negligent

  4. Commonwealth v. Ober

    286 Mass. 25 (Mass. 1934)   Cited 45 times
    In Commonwealth v. Ober, 12 Cush. 493, 495, Shaw, C.J., said of the statute in an earlier form, "But our statute goes further, and not only proscribes actual hawkers and pedlers... but it extends to all persons, doing the acts prescribed."

  5. United States v. Schultze

    28 F. Supp. 234 (W.D. Ky. 1939)   Cited 20 times
    In United States v. Schultze, D.C.Ky., 28 F. Supp. 234, where a certain act was declared unlawful in a criminal statute, it was held that a defendant might be guilty on commission of the act, even though there was no evidence of any guilty knowledge or intent upon his part.

  6. State v. Litman

    138 A. 132 (Conn. 1927)   Cited 28 times

    The nine accused were jointly charged with the statutory crime of assault with intent to commit murder upon two brothers employed in a dress-goods factory who were leaving their home under guard to enter a taxicab furnished by their employer as a means of transportation to and from work. The State offered evidence to prove that, about a month before the occasion in question, the brothers were followed from the factory to their home by two of the accused in an automobile which was stopped by the police

  7. State v. Fulco

    194 So. 14 (La. 1940)   Cited 10 times
    In State v. Fulco, 194 La. 545, 194 So. 14, 17, this Court stated that, "An evil intention or guilty knowledge, which is an essential part of crimes at common law, is, in some cases but not in others, held to be an element of crimes created by statute.

  8. In re Application of Ahart

    172 Cal. 762 (Cal. 1916)   Cited 23 times
    In Matter of Application of Ahart, 172 Cal. 762 [ 159 P. 160], the petitioner was charged under an ordinance prohibiting the transportation of intoxicating liquor "to any place, the establishing or keeping of which is prohibited by this ordinance."

  9. People v. Hoenschle

    132 Cal.App. 387 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)   Cited 5 times

    Docket No. 1250. June 1, 1933. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion in arrest of judgment. Martin I. Welsh, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A.M. Mull, Jr., for Appellant. U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent. PULLEN, P.J. The defendant was charged under two separate informations, one for manslaughter, the evidence showing the

  10. United States v. Doak

    5 F. Supp. 561 (N.D.N.Y. 1933)   Cited 3 times

    January 24, 1933. Oliver D. Burden, U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y. (Roger O. Baldwin, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Syracuse, N.Y., of counsel), for the United States. Wm. Rosenzweig, of New York City, for petitioner. Habeas corpus proceeding by the United States, on the relation of Antonino Sollano, on behalf of Salvator Sollano, an alien, against Wm. Doak, Commissioner of Labor, and W.W. Hull, Commissioner of Immigration. Writ dismissed and the alien remanded to custody of the immigration authorities. Affirmed