In the Matter of O

12 Cited authorities

  1. Schneiderman v. United States

    320 U.S. 118 (1943)   Cited 534 times
    Holding citizenship “should not be taken away without the clearest sort of justification and proof,” and that proof cannot “leave the issue in doubt”
  2. Bridges v. Wixon

    326 U.S. 135 (1945)   Cited 461 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding only that a court may not admit hearsay for substantive, as opposed to impeachment, purposes
  3. Schenck v. United States

    249 U.S. 47 (1919)   Cited 738 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Finding the right to free speech to be limited during World War I, reasoning “[w]hen a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured”
  4. Ng Fung Ho v. White

    259 U.S. 276 (1922)   Cited 374 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Permitting habeas corpus review of deportation orders
  5. Ginsberg Sons v. Popkin

    285 U.S. 204 (1932)   Cited 280 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Construing sections of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898
  6. Mahler v. Eby

    264 U.S. 32 (1924)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government failed to comply "with all the statutory requirements"
  7. Kessler v. Strecker

    307 U.S. 22 (1939)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that "as the Secretary erred in the construction of the statute, the writ must be granted"
  8. Johannessen v. United States

    225 U.S. 227 (1912)   Cited 164 times
    Holding that the retroactive effect of a denaturalization order does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws
  9. Bugajewitz v. Adams

    228 U.S. 585 (1913)   Cited 91 times
    Holding that the determination that an alien is an undesirable person "is not a conviction of crime, nor is the deportation a punishment; it is simply a refusal by the Government to harbor persons whom it does not want"
  10. Turner v. Williams

    194 U.S. 279 (1904)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that an excludable alien is not entitled to First Amendment rights, because ‘[h]e does not become one of the people to whom these thing are secured by our Constitution by an attempt to enter forbidden by law"