§

In the Matter of Neely and Whylie

11 I&N Dec. 864 (B.I.A. 1966)
In the Matter of Neely and Whylie

4 Cited authorities

  1. Pino v. Nicolls

    215 F.2d 237 (1st Cir. 1954)   Cited 41 times
    Holding that "[t]he mere possibility of [the conviction being overturned] does not defeat deportation of the convicted alien; though of course if, prior to deportation, he has succeeded in one of these ways in upsetting his conviction, it can no longer serve as a basis for deportation"

  2. Wilson v. Carr

    41 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1930)   Cited 48 times

    No. 6042. June 2, 1930. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Central Division of the Southern District of California; Edward J. Henning, Judge. Habeas corpus proceeding by John Walmsley Wilson, opposed by Walter E. Carr, District Director of District 31, United States Immigration Service, at Los Angeles. Writ was dismissed, and petitioner remanded to custody for deportation, by the District Court [ 35 F.2d 537], and petitioner appeals. Reversed. William H. Wylie and H.P.L.

  3. Tillinghast v. Edmead

    31 F.2d 81 (1st Cir. 1929)   Cited 34 times
    Concluding larceny is crime involving moral turpitude

  4. Section 1251 - Transferred

    8 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 2,154 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Delineating crimes that make alien deportable